OK, well here's what I'd like to see at the end of the positive...

OK, well here's what I'd like to see at the end of the positive posts, just so anyone stumbling on the post will get a more balanced picture. Along the lines of:
Although we seem well respected and ahead of the field, with many potential buyers having samples, we have yet to sign a significant deal. And there lies the big question, can we land a big fish or continue to stumble from one cr/grant to the next?
Then there's a good reason to go check out both sides of the coin.
@captainblood. So what's your comment on the last online piece with a box for questions ' which WOULD be answered by staff' but weren't either on the day or in a followup email. How so few questions were let to be asked when all along knowing the scheduled end time and the speaker offering more answers only to be shut down by the host. It all seemed very confected and done to deny public answers and observations of the body language for the more pointed questions. It was very pantomime like.
I'd love your take on that because to me it smacked of avoiding any real scrutiny whilst attempting to appear open to it.