A new calculation published yesterday has been debunked numerous times already?
I'm doubtful that's true Muddy.
If such a debunking even exists outside of your imagination, I doubt it has any sort of intellectual or mathematical rigor given whoever made it did in less than a day.
The article is right. We don't need to use farmland to switch to straight renewables in Australia. If anything, it's *farmers* who want the benefits of agrivoltaics.
Funny how you don't object when valuable farmland is used for fracking.
