There is a plethora of projects completed and under way from previous government policy. These have already installed batteries, covered the landscape with thousands of hectares of changed landuse - solar arrays and Wind farms. What is done is done and has increased the cost of energy considerably. Setting unrealistic targets has also been undertaken.
Additionally, millions of people have replaced equipment previously powered by fuels, added personal wind generators, solar arrays and water turbines where and when it became rational to do so, and use new equipment powered by renewable energy storage.
I pose the question .... Who says, how much, by when, by whom, best / worst case, integrated on what basis and why is one idea more "right" than another. Are contingency plans allowed? Why does there not seem to be an integrated approach to resource demand / supply so that the transformation doesnt send everyone broke rushing toward utopia.
