A senior official at the UN says that the term ‘Net-Zero’ has now become a PR problem for the climate alarm religion, according to a report at the UK Guardian.
A guy named [checks notes] Chris Stark, the chief executive of the [checks notes] Climate Change Committee (CCC) says, “Net zero has definitely become a slogan that I feel occasionally is now unhelpful, because it’s so associated with the campaigns against it. That wasn’t something I expected.”
Share
LOL. Seriously, you didn’t expect a term used to promote the most massive transfer of wealth in world history based on a global fraud would become “unhelpful” at some point? Really?
Yes, really. Here is an unintentionallyhilarious excerptfrom this Guardian story:
[End]
Yeah, sure, it’s all because of those darn “culture warriors” who insist upon dealing with multi-trillion-dollar, government subsidized “solutions” based on facts and actual observations instead of the outcomes of easily manipulated models designed to reach predetermined outcomes. Such nasty people, those culture warriors!
So, if “net-zero” is a PR problem now, what is Stark’s solution? Is it maybe to advocate everyone take a step back from this mad rush into energy reliability oblivion and maybe reconsider the public policy actions that are in the process of bankrupting entire nations?
Oh, hell, no. Are you kidding?
No, the solution advanced by Mr. Stark is to…wait for it…change the propaganda behind the slogan. Just shift the narrative one more time and keep doubling-down on disastrous, ruinous failure.
No, I’m not making that up. Here’s another excerpt from the story:
[End]
Ok, well, instead of calling it “net zero,” here are some catchy alternative suggestions that would actually fit:
- Total Tomfoolery
- Shameful Shenanigans
- Bankrupting Boondoggle
- Grotesque Grift
If none of those work, just get back to me, Mr. Stark. I got a million of ‘em.
[UPDATE: Tammy Nemeth suggests adding “Stone Age” to the list of alternatives, which is just absolutely PERFECT. LOL!]
That is all.
