AFR Artical

"Crawford says it is too soon to tell if Sydney will end up with one casino and that it is ultimately up to the government. But he believes it’s something the government may look at in the long term. “We will hold [Star] accountable,” he says. “If they can get through Bell, fine. If they can’t, we have a lot of work to do.”

This article was disturbing. If it accurately reflects the situation, it strongly suggests that Crawford has reached a definitive conclusion if he had his way. It is imperative that no leader be portrayed in such a manner, as it raises questions about their suitability for a key leadership position. Neutrality should be paramount. The article also highlights a long history with the past, which may or may not hinder individuals from functioning well in the present and future. Additionally, there is no indication that Star is currently engaged in any illegal activities or breaking any laws.In today's environment, where stringent regulations prevent arbitrary dismissals or undue pressure, motivating staff to promptly comply can be challenging and slow. Focus should be on factual information rather than opinions. It's possible to speculate that the commission isn't quite getting what they want, so perhaps they have initiated this review to ensure they are covering their tracks while exerting maximum pressure. "Philip Crawford is on a one-man crusade against Star Entertainment."As long as SGR adheres to legal requirements and directives, there should be no justification for revoking its license. No person, company or country should be held accountable for other people's past actions when they had nothing to do with their choices. Let's focus on the present and the future, not the past. Keep striving, SGR.