Well
@mick z, somebody whimped it and had you moderated but it weren't me.
I do contact CCZ and do get responses. I have no intention of talking to their contract geos - they're the problem of CCZ. That CCZ has no direct employee who can cast a critical eye over the work of the contractors is their problem.
As far as employment, I make money out of shares (over all) when not farming and am retired from mining. Why do I bother with CCZ? Because I can - Cangai high grade resource piqued my interest. When I looked into it I didn't believe it. When they drilled it who continued to believe it? Then came Mt Oxide with every base metal ore type under the sun signed off by a coal geologist / CCZ shareholder.
You've been cheering them on for four years or more and who's been more right? Perhaps you if you loaded up on 23/3/20.
Cangai was described as the flagship in the LSE prospectus. It was your flagship way back when - how's it working for you?
Cangai to proceed to DFS via Scoping Study - can't wait for that!
What of the monetisation of the Cangai stockpiles. Copper price says go but what have you...crickets!
Big One mineral resource due how long ago? How's that working for you?
Still waiting for the drone survey for the Cangai and Big One stockpiles...
Plenty of "Strategic Intents" to keep you enthralled.
"Arya to be drilled before Big One" was announced.
35 x RC and 2 x DD holes in Big One phase 1 became 21 x RC holes even if CCZ reported there were 20 x RC holes in their update.
40m intercepts actually 10/14 with balance uneconomic rubbish.
How many of the "Next Steps" in the announcements have actually been realised?
How are they going with the access road for the Arya drilling? Still refining logistics?
Hole 318RC could be OK but is it 33m @ 1% chalcocite and 1m @ 15% or what? The data were there but we weren't to see them. What is the true width of 318RC? My sectional view says about 10m, that of course is dependent on 318RC being on the same section as 315RC and 316RC but who knows?
So I ask a question about B07 and its neighbours and you get touchy. I'll make it more simple for you...
301 has a 14m intercept about 30m below surface.
303 has an 11m intercept about 30m below surface.
301 and 303 are 25m apart along strike.
B07 is between 301 and 303 and has an intercept of 12m about 30m below surface.
On face value one would suggest that the three are on different sections of the same lode.
However if you draw a line between the 301 and 303 intercepts you find that the B07 intercept sits about 15m south of that line.
Eureka! Two high grade lodes!!!!
If however you eyeball the plot of the hole traces of the WME series is
seems that they are plotted too far south.
After all, no other holes have found anything of note in the hanging wall of the line of lode.
(20min delay)
