Yes appropriately named 76 metres of mineralisation some parts...

Yes appropriately named 76 metres of mineralisation some parts of that zone could be 4 or 5% but if we can average.8 to 1.2 IMO 1% would be a great average. This will add huge tonnage to the Near surface DSO.

When talking about hole 3 Tom Ullrich was really excited about the deeper zone which intersected 2 metres of chalcocite bornite and some cp. I think from memory it was because it proved their theory that the tools of the ground gravity survey and EM were both working i think he also used the term Holy Grail in describing these outcomes they were getting.

So while most were excited by the 76m Tom was excited by the deeper rich 2m because i think it further proved that this layer must be the source feeding the near surface ore. And the tools work.