As I said, the company should have had contingency measures in...

First 21 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Tumbleroll

3,495 Posts.

09/02/17

16:31

Post #: 22494131
Share

Originally posted by dolcevita ↑

you refuse to respond to any specifics and go back to generalisations.

Hmm. Management was caught wrong-footed.

How?

I'll call a spade a spade.

Leave off! You're distorting the facts and refusing to engage on them. We're shovelling someone's bs with that spade instead of having a substantive discussion.

and the resulting uncertainty and obvious lack of direction

What uncertainty? There is always uncertainty to the extent that any company operates within commercial in confidence about future prospects and what it is able to release to the market.

The last ann clearly said where we are going strategically. You need to read that along with the last 6 months of anns to get a feel for what is going on.

If you decide to get antsy because you refuse to do that, I will call a spade a spade and say it's nobody's problem but yours. The value that's being eroded is our time in reading your posts. sorry to be blunt...but IMO.

Expand

As I said, the company should have had contingency measures in place in case Rio decided to walk. They should have been exploring options and conducting due diligence prior to this date (not several months afterwards). If this had occurred, we wouldn't now be waiting for Tony & Co. to work out where they're going next. Share holders have clearly lost patience with the lack of direction. That's why they're peeling off the registry.

AZS Price at posting: 1.6¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Held
1 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply