Is your reason for moving the discussion to this thread, to highlight the electrochemical testing that EGR undertook in 2020, NL? The fully disclosed data was presented and explained... unlike the so-called "optimised" study of RNU's in which statements are not backed by evidential data. Is that your point? Or is your point that tap density is one way of ascertaining "range or discharge rate" and that EGR have carried out testing using both physical and electrochemical methods already. However, is it possible that with improving technologies that EGR has yet to test Epanko and Merelani graphite in an optimised study which it is currently undertaking perhaps?
Ann: Results Confirm Superior Performing EcoGraf Battery Material, page-214
Add EGR (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
14.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $65.83M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 15.0¢ | 15.0¢ | 14.5¢ | $3.297K | 22.73K |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 2 | 79670 | 14.5¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0¢ | 20679 | 1 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 15.53pm 29/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
14.5¢ |
Change
0.000 ( 0.00 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 15.0¢ | 15.0¢ | 14.5¢ | 27524 | ||
| Last updated 14.07pm 29/05/2024 ? | |||||
| EGR (ASX) Chart |