Ann: Rincon Lithium Project - EIA Process Update, page-100

I know you've only been here a short while Truffles, but stakeholder engagement with the locals was occurring about a year ago now. We all assumed the locals were happy, and that's why you've never heard anyone mention further public engagement until today. In my view, and clearly in the view of everyone else here, there was zero remaining public engagement risk because everyone thought that phase was complete.

So how could anyone possibly say it's lower risk today versus yesterday, when it wasn't a concern then, and isn't a concern now? If JZ submits another hydrogeological report, despite already having submitted several "final" reports, does it become lower risk again?