Thanks for your reply. Just wondering though.. if it was the saw wouldn't both assays be polluted? Also would be pretty sloppy work from whoever was working the saw to not notice the blade deteriorating. Also unsure if that would leave enough cobalt in the sample to give the levels of cobalt in the initial assays. Then also it doesn't explain the gold levels In the initial assays. Both holes the cobalt occurred at depth, ie. it was not throughout the entire length of the samples. I am just thinking aloud but to me none of these theories hold water.
Anyway, we all know the risk with this one. Am curious as hell how it plays out!
DYOR
Thanks for your reply. Just wondering though.. if it was the saw...
Add LOT (ASX) to my watchlist
 (20min delay)
|
|||||
|
Last
45.5¢ |
Change
-0.010(2.15%) |
Mkt cap ! $837.7M | |||
| Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
| 47.0¢ | 47.0¢ | 45.0¢ | $1.011M | 2.210M |
Buyers (Bids)
| No. | Vol. | Price($) |
|---|---|---|
| 22 | 212336 | 45.0¢ |
Sellers (Offers)
| Price($) | Vol. | No. |
|---|---|---|
| 45.5¢ | 125039 | 22 |
View Market Depth
| Last trade - 12.32pm 03/05/2024 (20 minute delay) ? |
|
|||||
|
Last
45.5¢ |
Change
-0.010 ( 1.60 %) |
||||
| Open | High | Low | Volume | ||
| 47.0¢ | 47.0¢ | 45.0¢ | 1151500 | ||
| Last updated 12.51pm 03/05/2024 ? | |||||
| LOT (ASX) Chart |