Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

squidd, don't bother applying objectivity. Dave builds his views...

First 8 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Cowboyinvestor

19,970 Posts.

33

08/12/21

13:58

Post #: 58160348
Share

Originally posted by squidd: ↑

"Yes 6% had some ethics.Does not say much for the rest eh !"

Um, that $4.2Bn figure quoted by The Guardian article was the entire amount of jobkeeper received by the Listed entities required to report.

It is not a figure that relates to amounts received by Listed entities who's revenues did not fall by 30% etc.

Quite a difference.

For example, QANTAS was the biggest recipient with $856m. It's revenues fell 58% YOY and posted a loss of $1.83Bn. QANTAS didn't repay any jobkeeper, but by your comments, they have no ethics?

It's not entirely your fault though. The Guardian has slanted their headline in such a way that the reader should expect the full 100% to have been repaid for some reason?

Cheers!

Expand

squidd, don't bother applying objectivity. Dave builds his views from simply reading guardian headlines
Upvote

Reply

First 8 Last