Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Australia's corrupt politics, page-25

First 25 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Hanrahan

47,086 Posts.

24/05/15

17:02

Post #: 15340543
Share

Originally posted by Stevie.K ↑

..So your only issue is the labelling of it?

If they have exactly the same legal standing as marriage, why does there need to be a different label?
They love each other, they get married. that's it.
They get married, it's called marriage.

Just because they can't procreate doesn't mean they should be treated any different, some women can't get pregnant, some men are sterile, some couples choose not to have kids. Do they need to be labelled differently because of their ability or lack of to procreate?

Expand

That's all the "debate" is about: One word ie semantics. Why does it matter if an unnatural union isn't called the same as a traditional one?

Tradition marriage has served me well and I'm a bit sentimental about it. I have every right to be.
4 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 81 more messages in this thread...

First 25 Last