How you interpret is up to you Gneissic
Perhaps I should clarify the obvious. Dust storms in Sydney. you guys wet yourselves and the drought that caused it was Co2 related according to all the alarmist outlets.
Now look at these comments below I made and try again.
"NASA finds times before now were just as extreme."
"A few interesting comments here by NASA which draws similarities between the 20136/2014 drought and 1934"
Pauly, are you saying that you do agree with the article point of view that "The risk of severe mid-continental droughts is expected to go up over time, not down," he said."
I dont think that is the articles point of view. Perhaps yours. Well keyword is "expected" we have seen experts for decades now get the settled science and its state of the art latest sophisticated models not come to fruition.
So I would lean to we have no idea what is next.
