Climate Council's Tim Flannery criticises, page-67

  1. 12,654 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 501
    The same could be said about many things, it has to be of interest to the party. The point is sites like sceptical science who were also nominated I think, fail dismally in numbers and popularity for only one reason. They are biased, corrupt and generally deceptive. People see that sort of thing very quickly. WUWT presents lots of good science, and operates from a position of high morality. The site is run impeccably.They are sceptical, but they have plenty to be sceptical about. They always give credit where credit is due. It's unfortunate that the warmists have been so dishonest as it provides plenty of fodder. You know they have been, we all do. Your comments would be welcome there.
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.