"You posted previously and with certainty that the blast was caused by carbides"
Bradley you need to go take another look at that post of mine. Another poster mentioned carbide and I only confirmed it's volatility when in contact with water( second blast killed several fire fighters) . I have no clue whether carbide was stored on site or not and never made claims it was. I invite you to go back and read it again. Nuclear doesn't make an ounce of sense and is an insult to logic.
No plume to be seen in any vision, no radiation, no mention by authorities, nobody claiming responsibility, no logical reason for it.
Do you not think they would have evacuated more than a 2klm arc around site if there were fallout?
