again you continue to mis quote Everyone can see that nothing...

again you continue to mis quote
Everyone can see that nothing has been misquoted. It is the exact wording direct from a newspaper article. Why mislead these investors?

The rest of your statement seems to prove two things

1) you have confirmed that uranium was now found in the license area. Where previously you had stated...
there is uranium south of the fiord but not on the tanbreez licence.
Thank you for disproving your own statement And confirming that uranium was found in the license area as the article stated

2 You started that someone eg ggg could apply for Uranium rights over the tan breeze tenement
Which will now completely disproves your former statement, being..
ggg had the rights to uranium on that lease
You even describe yourself even further to suggest that tanbreeze could apply for the rights themselves. When you had already stated they hadn't taken. So again you prove those rights were available and were not taken.

I really just have to wait for you to bumble like a Magoo to disprove yourself without any effort from me to do it.All I keep asking is why are you trying to mislead investers here when you are the competition next door who could face bankruptcy should ETM operate?