You find Karls paper. I cannot and i will happily then concur with you or disagree.
You are blinded. You cannot argue calibration and timeframes when it is selectively applied at different times and in different locations.
That is pure BS.
I am glad you mention the "no significance" factor.
So is your global records that are contrived from these insignificant alterations that only go one way.
You are not capable critical thinking. You blindly accept everything you are told. It is conveinant for you to play dumb and use the old smoke screen of provide a paper.
Blind Freddy can see the calibrations are selectively applied.
