You could have opted for some honesty in your response. Instead...

You could have opted for some honesty in your response. Instead you churn out much the same disinformation as before.

Pity.

Your email address for Douglas is well out of date. The last publication I have found of his was with the Royal Society in about 2006. I expect he may have retired or passed on.

The later graph you posted is not the graph I queried. If you look at this graph in your link,

http://230nsc1.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/thermo/searise.html

you can actually see the increasing rate of sea level rise. More recent graphs show the trend more clearly.

You suggestion that the rate of sea level rise is constant is wrong.

The graph you presented was a fraud.

Note to denmor:

I did see your unattributed post and it was inappropriate. I'm sorry you found my language too difficult to understand so I will simplify my position in the hope you will understand.

I am suggesting the graph posted by ferronium is a fraud. I'm not suggesting it is ferronium's fraud but it is a fraud none the less.

Perhaps we should call it "Hide the rise"

What about "Sea Level Gate"?

Then again perhaps not.

Seawater Gate?