Global Warming, page-2

First 2 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
frasier

10,382 Posts.

27/09/14

08:37

Post #: 14037224
Share

Fairly stilted delivery but the point he makes is a valid one. We saw examples of "cooking the books" by our own CSIRO just a few weeks back. No amount of filibustering by them controverts anything Dr Jennifer Marohasy revealed.
http://jennifermarohasy.com/

Since Climategate, the inane ramblings of Tim Flannery,and the expose of the IPCC, the whole climate change/global warming agenda has resorted to subterfuge and trickery so that the funding taps stay on.

This doesn't help the alarmists' cause
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/blog/2014/jun/06/97-consensus-global-warming

Neither does this
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2010-01-21/un-admits-himalaya-glacier-data-dodgy/1216700

Nor does this book by Donna Laframbois

The Delinquent Teenager Who Was Mistaken for the World's Top Climate Expert

Donna Laframboise has gone through and documented procedures of the IPCC. Basically it turns out that a lot of researchers in relevant disciplines have been part of the IPCC’s work. But when they were choosing the texts that were to be used in their publication, it turns out that this is a work largely carried out by activists and bureaucrats.

For example, activists/bureaucrats clearly opposed the conclusions of the most renowned hurricane researchers, malaria scientists, oceanographers, geologists/paleontologists, glaciologists and atmosphere scientists. In addition, it appears that the head of the IPCC has close ties to the World Wildlife Fund (WWF). This is reflected clearly by the fact that several of propaganda prints originated from WWF is included in the IPCC reports. It identified 78 IPCC participants who are also members of the World Wildlife Fund’s Climate Witness Advisory Panel. These have both participated as editors and authors reports that not all such peer IPCC leader likes to tell us that they are.

Dona Laframboise’s investigations document that IPCC’s primary goal has nothing to do with science, but rather, as in many other bureaucracies, to maintain and expand its position. The main agenda seems to be the lust to tax and control the world community. Science is just an excuse to achieve this goal.

Expand
16 Upvote

Reply