Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Harvard historian: strategy of climate science, page-41

First 41 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
bergus

604 Posts.

30/07/14

09:02

Post #: 13735518
Share

Originally posted by septa ↑

If any of these climate scientist really cared about CO2 they would be pushing Nuclear as hard as possible... As it 100% fixes the carbon issue....

But how many will do it? None. Because they will have their funding cut if they do.

AGW need to denounce Tim Flannery and remove him from any position where he can talk to the public, as his 'predictions' were scaremongering and outrageous.

It's the Tim Flannerys and Al Gores of the world that are preventing any meaningful AGW discussion as they are scaremongerers not scientists. The problem then arises that the 10% of work that is good quality science and probably correct gets caught up in the 90% of AGW which is just tripe based around furthering careers.

Expand

Its not their job too "push" for anything.
1 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 29 more messages in this thread...

First 41 Last