Hazard reduction burns are 'not the panacea': RFS bossHazard reductions burns are being hampered by longer fire seasons and extreme weather, Rural Fire Service Commissioner Shane Fitzsimmons says, warning the controversial technique is "not the panacea" some may be looking for to temper bushfires.
The Commissioner on Wednesday defended the RFS' record on hazard reduction burning, saying the agency was not comprised of "environmental bastards", indicating prescribed burns were done with the priorities of people, property and the environment in mind.
Commissioner Fitzsimmons said the agency had met its targets for hazard reduction in the leadup to this year's horror bushfire season, but the "really awful" conditions across the drought-stricken state meant that fires had spread wildly regardless.
"Hazard reduction burning is really challenging and the single biggest impediment to completing hazard reduction burning is the weather," Commissioner Fitzsimmons told ABC Breakfast.
"It's only when the conditions back off a little bit that you actually have some prospect of slowing the fire spread."It's important, but not the panacea, and something we should have a very open and frank discussion about."
Commissioner Fitzsimmons said that the agency "worked through a sensible regime" with hazard reduction burns, with the weather on the day being the largest factor in determining if a burn could happen.
"Resourcing is challenging. Don't forget, as settled Australians, as Europeans, we are now living and working and occupying areas that used to burn freely," Commissioner Fitzsimmons said.
disallowed/national/hazard-reduction-burns-are-not-the-panacea-rfs-boss-20200108-p53poq.html
Raider
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Hazard reduction burns are 'not the panacea': RFS boss
Hazard reduction burns are 'not the panacea': RFS bossHazard...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 116 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)