A Court room full of liars and lawyers raking in millions. All this promoted by Wilkinson who promoted the evidence of an admitted liar. How does Wilkinson feel now that her muse has admitted to the Court that she is a liar. Does Wilkinson stand by this liars evidence? Which particular part of the liars evidence does she actually believe and represent as truth from a journalistic point of view? Is Wilkinson even eligible to be called a journalist or is she an ambulance chaser paid a million bucks to promote liars for the purposes of giving Ten ratings? Fair question.
