Share
clock Created with Sketch.
15/12/23
21:05
Share
Originally posted by street professor
↑
Webster is there to try and manage the fallout, from the Lehrmann defamation then Reynolds and Co then add in the Sharaz and Higgins personalities it is obvious she has no chance of managing the Higgins assault story implosion.
The coup de gras will be the enquiry into the Higgins compensation payout by the ALP, the angst was written all over the face of Dreyfus last week when he gave the female journo a lashing as he knows what's coming for him and the one term ALP Government.
If Britts had of just kept her dress on when crashing on the couch or better still just stayed in the taxi when Bruce got off at PH, Brucey did the runner when his Mrs started calling and texting nonstop asking where he was as most blokes would do that time of the morning. Higgins too drunk to get out of there so decided to sleep off the bender then came up with the story once she saw Bruce clearing out his desk on the Monday.
The fact it was reported Britts was naked on the couch probably cost Bruce his job, she wasn't found nude then potentially no incident reported although at this stage the naked sleep has got her $2.4m less costs at taxpayer expense.
Expand
What if Webster is the puppet master?
And what if Shiraz is the patsy comms guy and Higgins the asset that would win Lab gov and now needs to be 'managed'.
What if Shiraz contacting Gallagher was a ruse and Gallagher already well knew what was coming as per Reynolds 2 weeks warning notice?
As another poster pointed out, this stinks to high heaven.