I can’t see any massive issues arising as long as the tech can...

I can’t see any massive issues arising as long as the tech can be widely adopted and use by existing builders. Although Perth looked like a good place to start for FBR it was never going to be commercial. Each house different, land developments all over the place, one here, then one there. Builders not organised enough, things changing all the time. It wasn’t the right market for Hadrian and TBH may never be.

What it was good for was practice, and it did that well. I managed to watch 109 on a fair few of the sites and it definitely got better, used different blocks, different builds and was a perfect practice run for Hadrian.

110 is perfect for US, large developments, developer tends to sort the build as well. Hadrian can do what it does best, build quick, clean and less waste. The tactic should be to work with the best block maker and let them help FBR work out how to work in the international market. The WAAS partner know which builders to work with and how to sell their blocks. More sales means more work for FBR.

US then Aus then Europe then Sovereign wealth fund.