You need to be careful that you are not double counting byproduct credits, as they stated that the total site expenditure of $36.6 mm last quarter was net of byproduct credits.
I also wouldn’t want to be assuming that nickel payability was as high as 80%, nor would I take the short cut of assuming byproduct credits offset payability deduction (regardless that byproduct credits appear to have already been used as an offset on the cost ledger).
I believe you are being overly optimistic.
EL
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- Is PAN cash flow positive?
You need to be careful that you are not double counting...
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 18 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Add PAN (ASX) to my watchlist
(20min delay)
|
|||||
Last
3.5¢ |
Change
0.000(0.00%) |
Mkt cap ! $103.9M |
Open | High | Low | Value | Volume |
0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | 0.0¢ | $0 | 0 |
Featured News
PAN (ASX) Chart |
Day chart unavailable
The Watchlist
MGU
MAGNUM MINING AND EXPLORATION LIMITED
Neil Goodman, MD
Neil Goodman
MD
SPONSORED BY The Market Online