I agree with you. In the long run it would be better for us...

I agree with you. In the long run it would be better for us small Invictus shareholders. Scott has proven he is one hell of petroleum engineer, is open, honest, and has the interests are aligned to shareholders and Zimbabwe. He has planned very well, but may be lacks a bit of financial acumen and needs someone that can give him good financial advice rather than depending on Pac Partners who only serve their own interests. (Vote no to resolutions 9,10,11 in the upcoming AGM). It would be far better for Invictus to control their 70-80% of the project rather than go in cahoots with another oil company.

Like many here, I have sold out early, taking small profits and missed the real gains. In other cases, the company has been taken over at what looked like a good price, but was grossly undervalued by the market. In so doing, I have sold the good shares and kept the duds. This time is different: I bought early and I ain't selling. It is becoming clear Invictus is grossly undervalued and Scott is the right person to steer us through the difficulties ahead, albeit with a decent financial guy. HODL.