The complexities of human existence:
as has been mentioned previously, (various other threads of the past) mankind is akin to religions only because of his natural disposition to his survival instincts gone whoop whoop or on walk about.
The appetites play a prime role into whether an individual is one for him or herself or whether he or she is to become part of another play, the other role is a playmaker for a part in the survival of the species, which is nonetheless an important play but the missing point is you are not an individual and thus the intellect goes astray. The role of the masses are to serve the masters (religious bodies) and to garenteer that the species survive. Whereas on the other hand an individual will control his or her appetites and generate a mental or intellectual attitude. The individual will think and reason and see life in a reasonable fashion embracing the enthusiasm that life is, whereas a mass player will engage in materialistic mannerisms feeding his or her ego in a vulgar way, forgetting at times that life is different and has the religious nobility think for them. The religions corner the subject by thus eliminating the idea of the will as the subject may not run astray or away.
Ofcourse, to believe or not to depends entirely upon us but .....
