Look, pal, I'm gonna respond politely to you, because I like your posts in the Russia threads. So my question to you is how do you know what his intentions are? One, very comfortable inference can be drawn is that the murder, by stabbing, of people unknown to him, in public place was in furtherance of a political, religious or idealogical cause. Is it the ONLY inference? No. But in circumstances where the police conceded that they don't have a motive, on what possible, rational basis can it be excluded? Indeed, especially as public stabbings of this nature have been ideologically and politically motivated in the past. But if you want to believe our WOKE police force, that's a matter for you. If you reread my original post, I objected to the assertion that 1/ His motives were unknown, but 2/ It wasn't terrorism.
