Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

off an 80kg "log" without damaging it?In the court case it was...

First 360 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
pugsley100

14,237 Posts.

5

15/04/24

22:12

Post #: 73357588
Share

Originally posted by kacy: ↑

"Lerhmann has no grounds for appeal"

You are wrong there, as I have explained above.

You are also wrong about Lehrmann taking Higgins dress off. I challenge you to take a dress (and underclothes) off an 80kg "log" without damaging it?

Besides, no one has ever claimed that Lehrmann took her clothes off. .

The issue of how and why Higgins became naked implies consent, because that is not something you normally do at the office unless you are intent on having sex.

Its as simple as that, and therefore the judge is wrong.

Expand

off an 80kg "log" without damaging it?

In the court case it was stated that she weighed in the low 60kg at the time of the rape.
That was used as part of the toxicology discussion.
Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 291 more messages in this thread...

First 360 Last