Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Nippy our judicial system does not allow a Jury in a defamation...

First 205 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
Bananabender1

10,976 Posts.

10

26/04/24

13:05

Post #: 73523882
Share

Originally posted by nippy: ↑

I have already addressed the 1 judge versus a jury issue. Each still needs to form a view either way or in-between. Anyone can look up the perceived issues with each type as well as the perceived advantages. I already said I prefer the 1 judge way, so no one is running away. It is all in your head.

YOU Parsifal are running away from giving me a better explanation for Brittany's behaviours >

1) lying to the police about doctors evidence.
2) recanting same after press coverage and police investigation were well underway.
3) faking leg bruising evidence
4) prior claims of wanting a sex scandal on a low evidence requirement basis

If it's good for the Bruce its good for the slander. ( apologies to the goose and gander )

Traumatized rape victims simply don't make up claims of having acquired false documentary evidence from third parties like a doctor. No one has provided a better explanation then this just being one lie of many from a scammer. This goes doubly so given the faked leg bruise evidence.

Expand

Nippy our judicial system does not allow a Jury in a defamation case such as this. It was always going to be a judge only trial and verdict. It's been done and the decision has been made and zero talk of an appeal. If you see yourself as a budding Judge then go to uni and get a degree in Law.
4 Upvote

Reply

There are more pages in this discussion • 30 more messages in this thread...

First 205 Last

SPONSORED BY