100%.There is nothing more influential on IMU's worth than...

100%.

There is nothing more influential on IMU's worth than additional Complete Responses in current trials. Truly price sensitive.

So if the CRs Leslie references are in current trials then either:

1. She's telling porkies.

2. She's in violation of continuous disclosure requirements.

Of course she's way too crafty for it to be either of these. She's conflating CRs from multiple trials (none of which can be legitimately attributed to IMU's treatments due to the statistical insignificance anyway) while talking about IMU's current work. And then leaving it to the fan club to draw fantastical conclusions.

Is she "stumbling on words and topics" or is it more sinister than that? Seems to be a similar "stumble" every time she's in a scripted, paid-for interview.