Once again neither side of politics can come to blame the Muslims.
On the radio on the way in this morning 1026 am (BBC) the opposition
politician for legal affairs said that no-one has ever been prosecuted for marrying
children as young as 10, 12,14, to men 20 yrs older or more.
Now it`s against Australian law -so my question is
what legal definition are they being tried on?
Claire opposition legal spokesperson was even to PETRIFIED to mention the only
one`s that condone and carry out such action--Muslim`s!!
We must look after the children she claimed !
Who children--certainly not Australian children--as the Muslim parents are in on the act.
So the Alp want to pretend to bring in a law that can try some group--who they are even to frighten
to mention -in case of losing their vote.Alp putrid in every-way, yet refuse to try them under
Australian law--with judges continually allowing them of on so called religious grounds.
Yet only 1 Cult can claim religious protection as all other face Australian laws.
While the Catholic Church has signed up to child abuse,
I wonder why no party as ask the Cult that does not even try to hide the practice
to also put in funds. Although I would think any complainant would be silenced( permanently).
What a wonderful country our left wing politicians have turn into a Sheethole.
- Forums
- Political Debate
- Mom`s the Word
Mom`s the Word
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 7 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)