"I must have missed your compelling evidence that the missile came from the Ukrainians? Can you post it again so people can see why it trumps all previous evidence?"
Evidence of another entity committing the crime was not required to debunk your information provided inferring guilt to the militia's of Novorossia. To suggest otherwise, you have invoked a propaganda technique known as 'transfer'.
"Never let the facts get in the way of a good story."
As I exposed the lacking foundation of 'facts' in your previous claim, I am lost as to the 'facts' in which you draw. Perhaps you could shed light? As goodbrad previously mentioned, the idea is 'innocent till proven guilty'. I am not required to 'prove' any guilt on another party to debunk your statements.
