Only 120 articles studied out of 85,000 + published on climate change between 1997 and 2013.
It is obvious Lund should be ashamed of his inadequacies with such a small sample.
How did he select his 120 out of the massive publications in climate science? Or did he just pick his own mates articles.
For corruption and misleading he could have started with east anglia climate gate very obviously and also Mann who won`t show his hockey stick data.
How pathetic!
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- No publication bias found in climate change research
Only 120 articles studied out of 85,000 + published on climate...
- There are more pages in this discussion • 3 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
SS1
SUN SILVER LIMITED
Gerard O’Donovan, Executive Director
Gerard O’Donovan
Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online