Australia's largest stock trading and investment forum Australia's #1 stock forum

Are they the same "highly qualified academics" who can't define...

First 141 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
LoadedDog

14,464 Posts.

11

22/05/24

23:14

Post #: 73964476
Share

Originally posted by Scott th Ratbag: ↑

cause the writers of the report are highly qualified academics and researchers from a range of disciplines, including economics and engineering.

their focus is on the costs translated to Australian conditions. even OECD and IMF experts don't get the full picture. and these people are dedicated scientists not like those easily bought by the FF lobby.

Expand

Are they the same "highly qualified academics" who can't define "woman", or the same ones who told us the jab was "safe and effective" and that IVM was a "horse wormer" NOT for humans in spite of billions of doses being administered already?
4 Upvote

Reply

Top Stories

LSR

From the Floor question: "Why are you going back to Ned's Creek for a drilling campaign?" | Lodestar Minerals

ASX Market Close: Index gains 1% after interest rates pause | June 18, 2024

MiningNews Select Conference: Smooth permitting, strong teams the key to project success and reaching demand

MiningNews Select Conference: Look further afield for funding projects, advises Rick Rule

SS1

Sun Silver gets that drill to thrill feeling from high grade hits at Maverick Spring

There are more pages in this discussion • 91 more messages in this thread...

First 141 Last

SPONSORED BY