AFYou might also find these extracts from the Amagrad report of...

AF
You might also find these extracts from the Amagrad report of use in your analysis of what lies between hole 1 and hole 4







The following extract from the report interprets the findings.

"Results for topography, radiometrics, and magnetics confirm features defined from regional data, as would be expected, but with much better control on occurrence and geometry. An interim interpretation of structure is illustrated in Figure 35, along with the regional Th anomalies for reference, that suggests a highly complex structural setting with major disruption of regional faults and stratigraphy.The major 18km long magnetic feature at Frewena Far East is seen to consist of several faulted blocks, or zones, with major dislocations occurring in the vicinity of the Eastern Topographical feature. Also noted is a well-developed network of subparallel, north-south orientated features in the western portion of the image. These may relate to a dyke swarm. Numerous cross cutting features are noted that raises the potential for dilutional sites near the vicinity of structural intersections that could be potential host sites for IOCG style intrusive features."

It would appear that Hole 1 & 4 were drilled on the edges of major anomalies. No wonder Geo's were interested at inspecting both cores.

So many targets for Inca to investigate and that is only one tenement. Not to long to go now before we get a major re-rate in my opinion.