Oh, I did see the link and I watched that single minute. And I understand what he is suggesting, but he has no way to prove it what he suggests.
He is an unqualified, third party that does not have access to the actual election data that auditors would. Even if it was the data, he's not an auditor, he's a dude with Microsoft Excel and an affinity for using Paint. We have no reason to believe that he has information that literally no party involved in any audit has.
You've stated multiple times that you don't understand fully what he is covering, yet you're so keen to believe and trust him. Why? What's the motive for trusting this unqualified youtuber? What position of authority does he hold that you are just happy to accept his word that things aren't correct based on what he "is seeing"? Can you provide me evidence that he is correct?
