Think about what you just posted Nathan---Bomber had respect Really---once Ess regained Hird as coach as they always said they would,Bomber had the chance to stay on like before Hird suspension--yet choose not to. 3 other clubs could have picked up the2 time premiership coach--yet they all refused. While must supporter are disappointed--the players--are to easily let of the hook. The player keep taking their payments. Just like Carlton--Malthouse goes--the player improves--as now their playing futures are on the line. Most Ess players career will be over by time the end game comes into play. The players have never tested positive through numerous test--if anything if they did take performance enhancing drugs --they should get their money back. Now if Danks is the so call supplier--who first employed him---(AFL)--then to the Gold Coast then Ess.So if Ess done their DD--they would have got the heads up from the Afl. When they won the 10--11 games they played many of the bottom -sides along with interstate sides in Melb. Worried about brands WA--Eagles(drug kings)Afl over-looked,Brisbane 23 injection b4 Grand-final, Collingwood2 players(found positive), St Kilda(1 player-positive) Gold Coast--who knows--another 11 clubs besides Ess said they where outside the supplement program--how quick we forget. All clubs Sided with Afl(like the 15 bike riders that took drugs--to bring down Lance Armstrong---no charges). People in glass houses should not throw stones. The same players where playing against--Sydney,Hawthorn,Carlton--except for injuries !! In reality the Afl are more culpable than Ess as they where the first to employ Danks. Know the story--not just the HIGH-LIGHTS ! Weapon with Bomber at Geelong ??????????
Write your reply here
reply here
