Originally posted by pear
Hi Mr Gordon
Pear, when I use the term Christendom, I am referring to an apostate form of professed Christianity. The Scriptures as originally written were ''inspired of God''.
In 313 C.E., this apostate form of Christianity was granted legal recognition by the pagan Roman Emperor Constantine. From that time on, Church and State began working hand in hand. Historians refer to pagan Rome as having been “Christianized” in the fourth century. The truth is that by that time an apostate form of Christianity had joined the pagan religious organizations of the Roman Empire as members of Babylon the Great
If you believe that, then why do you keep quoting their books?
Everything that we have has come down from them. I have seen your and wotsup's nonsensical posts of trying to convert the English versions of the bible back int anciento Greek and back again into English with a different meaning to suit your particular beliefs.. We can only laugh at the absurd conclusions you make.
You can't have it both ways. You can't call them apostates and then quote their books.
One more thing, why do you keep calling your God an idiot? Did your God not know that by the time the books were written Babylon was no longer a power? Was your God afraid of the Roman Gods?
Pear
You will never grip this eel.
I have great admiration for whomever firewalled this belief system from any possible attack from logic, reason, proof, or truth, t
hey are teflon coated against everything but their own system of things. They have done a bang-up job, because these guys don't engage in an exchange, they tell you their truth and ignore everything you say.
Pear is worldly and thus has no understanding.
Pear is in league with apostate Christianity and thus, satan.
There are several dozen snippets of Scripture that can be cut and pasted to substantiate any belief they might have, regardless of how out of context they might be. They will cut and paste fragments of science, philosophy, or from Creationist scientists that seem to support their beliefs, even when the complete article or the person quoted is diametrically opposed to their point of view.
I think your post was on the money. How do they think that Christianity got from Christ to them? Well they have and answer for that too. And they don't think they are a religion per se, or they have clergy class, and they see themselves in every nook and cranny of the Bible. See how he quoted Timothy and Revelation, it's all about them. The Bible is a mirror they can hold up and see only their own refections in.
Like he said.
Stay tuned as they will soon be removed.
