Seriously you need to be a lot more insightful in your interpretation of data - OBVIOUSLY "FLU_LIKE" symptoms are caused by more viruses than just the flu virus, thats why we have the qualified designation of "FLU -LIKE" otherwise it would be FLU symptoms.
So your 10% effectiveness figure is nonsensical, -it would only make sense if Doctors treated "Flu-Like" symptoms with the flu vaccine, which is not the case. The FLU jab is a preventative against TRUE Flu not a treatment FLU-Like virus illness.
So here is the kicker - you're misunderstanding of the data above does nothing to support your view, that the FLU Vaccine does not actually work in protecting against TRUE Flu.
