Yup...you listen to your thought-provider...theyre the same ones that told you SD and the evidence from MC buried DT.
You go with that.
And you're right about the jury...but if even one of them has more sense than you... the jury is hung.
And btw...the Prosecution will rest this week. So tell me...show me a skerrick of evidence that proves beyond a reasonable doubt the points raised in my last post
DT knew about the payment (not a crime), and
he MC acted on his behalf (not a crime) and then
DT was party to the decisions to label the payment as one thing or another (still not a crime) and then...
that all of this was done to influence an election
