Trump V Clinton...my view

Originally posted by ex bull ↑

A year ago Trump was a Democrat who turned up at the Republican debate. Had been done before so no big deal. Also he was good friends with the Clintons.

My view was that he intended to wreck the Republican selection process to help Clinton but he never ever expected to win. The views he expressed where those that he was hearing in his Casino bars which was a reflection of the word on the street. Suddenly he surged to the lead in the polls and the Clinton friendship was tossed into the bin.

My support for Trump is reluctant and is more an anti Clinton position. Most of what he says will never get through Congress and the Senate. Worse we don't really know what his really policies will be except for immigration.

The demographics in the West are undergoing a rapid change for the worse. Those who built the industrial wealth and hence modernity of the West are being replaced by those with no tradition of modernity and they get the vote. Modernity is hitting roadblocks in most Western countries. Voters who believe that taking from others is their main goal have been changing the balance. Trump may restore a temporary balance.

The big effort to educate the children in poor countries so that they can develop their poor nations has failed. We end up with Crony capitalists and worse. When educated youth of these countries hear about the handout mentality in wealthy Western countries they want to get some. So they are trying to flood these countries. Trump is the only who may solve this crisis.

Clinton supports the flooding because eventually they will vote Democrat. She is prepared to destroy the modern USA in order to recruit future Democrat voters. The bonus for her is that the gimme community will vote for her. Trump has better
chance of halting the flood and asking voters what THEY want.

Expand

hillary was and is a master of rehearsed, meaningless, motormouthing duckspeak-type political spiel formulated by a team of lefties flunkies and often tested for impact advertising-style on various groups...

hillary spoke to her voting block and financial backers of wall-street crooks, mega-wealthy saudi islamifacist extremists and mindless leftist drones and leftist media who likely appreciate the talent of the rehearsed meaningless political duckspeak hillary delivered and are confronted and distressed by any content than includes reality...

Trump was spontaneous, spoke his mind, had clear points to make and addressed his audience of middle America and the downtrodden communities who the democrats have systematically looted and manipulated for decades...

Trump was a clear winner with Americans and hillary was a clear winner with the leftist media and their drones, and her mega-rich saudi islamofacist extremists backers...

Duckspeak[edit]

Duckspeak is a Newspeak term meaning literally to quack like a duck or to speak without thinking. Duckspeak can be either good or "ungood" (bad), depending on who is speaking, and whether what they are saying is in following with the ideals of Big Brother. To speak rubbish and lies may be ungood, but to speak rubbish and lies for the good of "The Party" may be good. In the appendix to 1984, Orwell explains:
Ultimately it was hoped to make articulate speech issue from the larynx without involving the higher brain centres at all. This aim was frankly admitted in the Newspeak word duckspeak […]. Like various words in the B vocabulary, duckspeak was ambivalent in meaning. Provided that the opinions which were quacked out were orthodox ones, it implied nothing but praise, and when the Times referred to one of the orators of the Party as a doubleplusgood duckspeaker it was paying a warm and valued compliment.
— Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four
An example of a skillful duckspeaker in action is provided in the beginning of chapter 9, in which an Inner Party speaker is haranguing the crowd about the crimes of Eurasia when a note is passed into his hand; he does not stop speaking for a moment, or change his voice or manner, but (according to the changed party line) he now condemns the crimes of Eastasia, which is Oceania's new enemy.