In defence of Buckland, this is just silly. I've read the posts,...

First 93 Last

Share
Profile

Follow
srwilson

167 Posts.

23/02/15

17:26

Post #: 14803659
Share

Originally posted by matthias208 ↑

You're not the only one! There's a slippery slope here towards what I call OCD-R (Obsessive Compulsive Down-Ramping). But who knows what his actual motive is? I would guess it is somewhere between justifying the selling of his holdings to himself (due to not achieving the quick profit that he was looking for 12 months ago), creating negative sentiment so that he can jump on board at a low price in anticipation of an increase in SP as trials progress into their next phase (down-ramping) and of course debating for the sake of winning (which becomes a psychological issue more than anything relevant here).

This seems to me to be a common tension that can arise between short term players and longer term investors. The short term players act as though a treatment for cancer should be discovered in one fell swoop of a single massive scale trial. Hence early stage results with regard to feasibility, potential, safety, and consistency with expectations are dismissed with an attitude of "this doesn't prove it cures cancer". Of course this creates an impression of casting negative aspersions on efficacy of PPL-1 when perhaps they just wanted to criticise the company for not constantly providing positive updates and reports to satisfy their desire for significant enough fluctuations in SP over the short term so that they can make a quick buck and get out.

Expand

In defence of Buckland, this is just silly. I've read the posts, as I'm interested in learning more about this co. Buckland is clearly just seeking more information about the directors and questioning the efficacy of updates, etc. Downramping is a word that gets thrown around far too often IMO.

Without the kind of questions Buckland poses, these threads would be useless.

PAA Price at posting: 0.8¢ Sentiment: None Disclosure: Not Held
2 Upvote

0 Great analysis

Reply