Share
13,263 Posts.
lightbulb Created with Sketch. 270
clock Created with Sketch.
25/05/17
23:06
Share
Originally posted by poyndexter
↑
Hi bz
I worded my earlier posts in this thread carefully because there was a specific point I wanted to make without it being seen as as inciting.
For a range of reasons, a small portion of young (mostly male) Muslims in Western and Muslim countries end up being radicalised.
In western countries it seems a significant portion of this small number of radicalised or radicalising cohort end up on police and/or terror watchlists, but mostly it ends there and next thing one of them has carried out an atrocity.
All I am saying given the seriousness and increasing frequency of these atrocities, is that if police and security operatives are able to identify this small cohort, what is the point of then doing nothing about it?
Imo, politicuans and our legal system need to make a protocol of interventions possible. That's why I suggested compulsory routine counselling, continuing well into their mid 30's if necessary. It makes it clear they are under surveillance for their own anti-social, latently criminal actions. That way it is clear they own the circumstances of the country's proactive intervention.
Dex
Expand
Yeh it's a simple equation. Anyone who is male, under 30 and Muslim who has been proven to hold radical views should be separated from society. It needn't be a particularly punitive or harsh environment, but there needs to be an impenetrable boundary in place.
Last edited by
float^ :
25/05/17