Lets say there existed radical armed-to-the-teeth indigenous militia/s, which embedded themselves within say Redfern, and commenced firing rockets indiscriminately onto the Sydney Harbour Bridge and the CBD and any other loaction of their choosing.
Let's say they made it clear to the Australian public they would continue to fire rockets and do whatever the wished until such time Australian were either pushed into the Sydney Harbour and they had regained all the lands stolen by the "whitefella".
We all agree they were indisputably the original owners/inhabitants of the land (we acknowledge that in Parliament and at allofficial Government functions), but would their continued barrage of indiscriminate rockets be tolerated?
What exactly should the authorities do, if they knew hundreds, possibly thousands of Australian police and/or army personal would be required to be sacrificed in an attempt to contain this relentless barrage of rocket fire?
What would the authorities do if this was happening not only from Refern, but from many other locations?
Remember though, there is no disputation that the whitefella "stealing" their land.
Now if the "whitefella" could prove historically (as Israel can) that they had better original competing claims to Terra Australis consisting of thousands and thousands of years historical evidence, the "whitefella" wouldn't have too much of a conscience about how one should go about dealing with and eliminating the above hypothetical problem. That's more or less Israels position.
But what if the above did occur, Australians couldn't fall back on the Israeli rationale/position , which would mean if we did nothing, we'd be rooted.
