I agree with this - I think the gap is on the education/industry...

  1. OMS
    7,094 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 9
    I agree with this - I think the gap is on the education/industry side and the govt has prioritized the military side(unless iv missed some announcements that are adding this kind of learning in uni?)
    1. takes many years to train up a skilled Civilian workforce in the multiple facets required to sustain this technology
    2. given the timeframes for N Power and N Subs, the effort to upskill will need to be sustained across multiple generations / 30ish years.
    3. we will need imported skills(ie from countries that have run N powered stations) and we may be dependent on this type of workforce for a while until we can upskill our own citizens
    4. we can then taper down on imported skill as our own capability increases - giving you sovereign capability

    in the AUKUS optimal pathway they are doing something like the following

    Optimal Pathway | Australian Submarine Agency (asa.gov.au)

    Embedded Personnel, Port Visits and Submarine
    Rotational Force-West
    Beginning in 2023, Australian military and civilian personnel
    will embed with the UK and US Navies and – subject to
    necessary arrangements – within UK and US submarine
    industrial bases. This will accelerate the training and
    development of Australian personnel.

    The US plans to increase SSN port visits to Australia beginning
    in 2023, with Australian sailors joining US crews for training
    and development. The UK will increase port visits to Australia
    from 2026.

    Building on these increased port visits, from as early as 2027,
    the UK and the US plan to establish a rotational presence
    of one UK Astute class submarine and up to four US Virginia
    class at HMAS Stirling, Western Australia. This initiative will be
    known as Submarine Rotational Force-West (SRF-West).



 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.