Ann: Purported Requisition of Meeting , page-9

Another notable absence is EPS Management which was on the first s249D with 6,416,638 shares held ... that might be Simon Philis ... one of the directors whom CB is proposing.

So two of they key players are no longer on the s249D just lodged.

Given that the support of a minimum of 5% of the registered shareholders is required to call for an EGM I would not read too much into the absence of John Heugh and The Philis superfund since the 'rebels' or the 'syndicate' might just be keeping their powder dry in an attempt to disclose sufficient numbers to get the EGM called and then to bring in additional support for the vote.

Do not be complacent ... the 'syndicate' might have more support than what has been disclosed in the second s249D.

CB, I am interested to know whether you appear on the current list of shareholders which the company has provided as having called for the s249D? If not, why not? given that you are a very vocal supporter of this initiative.