cleansing statement, page-17

Snagger

Just saying it as I see it 'this week'...read the signature ;)

But i'll answer your questions seeing you asked:

I am for management. I support them. Wouldnt be invested if I didn't.In fact the MD at least has been able to do what others before him didn't or couldn't. I rate that.

I am for Timeone/SS&T. That is the deal management have chosen. See above. I think they demonstrate unprofessional opportunistism though.

I am for the facts.....why wouldn't I be?

Importantly i'm for saying it as I see it. Not saying i'm right of course. Things are never black and white.

The 'facts' are both positive and negative. The truth is both...not one or the other.

Unfortunately 'some' here (not suggesting you are one of those posters) can only see one sided arguments or points of view. Hence the unnecessary abuse and conflict here at times.

I'm not the only poster here who sees this. Many here get frustrated with the narrow mindedness of some posters here.

I see multiple sides from my very 'limited perspective' of course.

The facts change. Just look at the PFS as just one example. The resource changes. Cockatoo assumptions change. Management structure/board representation changes. Resource assumptions change. Markets change. MOU partners change. The share price changes. Cethana changed...etc etc

Change is the common denominator here.

But not once have I thought that PLV won't come through - that hasn't changed ;)

This is a discussion forum. Not a football match. Taking sides is not a prerequisite, nor is it necessary.

Some here still don't get that.