Tim, my intention was never to tarnish reputation, I don't think that my post did in anyway, perceived or real. However it obviously has irritated you, for that I do apologize. My posts intention, was to cast doubt on the veracity of mbooses claims. He has been caught out here several times, trying to pass mis-information as fact. He has obviously got a very strong anti-Avq agenda, for whatever reason and 90% of his posts reflect that. I, obviously am pro Avq, but do understand that it is highly speculative and trade in the stock with that in mind. I do get aggravated by blatant down rampers and those with sour grapes that look to blame everyone but themselves for trading losses. This I have stated many times before. In relation to you, I spent several hours trying to find any link between yourself and the SI, without luck. This coupled with mbooses reputation for telling porkies made me suspicious as to why, any barrister would discuss this obviously sensitive case with just anyone. However you've put your name to this forum and obviously we need to take that information as read. I'm not aware of your relationship with mboose, but I feel it was remiss of you to let him use your name on a forum such as this, without having a good understanding of his previous posts. Maybe you did, but it certainly doesn't seem like it. I'm glad this confusion has been cleared up, however, I'm still very skeptical of any post I see on this forum which has mbooses moniker attached to it. Again, maybe he and others are right, maybe this stock is doomed. I don't believe that to be the case and have taken up my position accordingly. As Blackie quite rightly stated, this should all be taking with a grain of salt, and we should applaud those who make cash and support those who do their arse. We all make mistakes and having it rubbed in our face by anonymous posters is pretty poor form. Cheers
AVQ Price at posting:
1.5¢ Sentiment: Buy Disclosure: Held
